If you had the opportunity, would you solve world hunger or stop all crime in the United States of America? If I had the choice, I would choose to end world hunger. Today's would-you-rather question is "Would you rather end world hunger or stop crime all over the United States?"
The most significant and main reason why I would choose to end world hunger is that it is broader. 828 million people go hungry every day, this is about three times more people than the population of the United States of America. Stopping world hunger can also help various countries develop and expand, whereas solving crimes in the United States of America would only help the United States of America. Although crimes are sad and tragic, most of them can be figured out. But there is not just a shortcut that you can take to stop world hunger. When there's a chance like that, you have to grab it. A lot of organizations are trying to solve this problem, and solving world hunger can let them do something else like stopping crime all over the United States of America.
But there is also a reason for stopping crime all over the United States of America. There are a lot of organizations trying to stop world hunger because it is easy and simple to do. Organizations just have to provide people with food and drinks. But stopping crime all over the United States of America isn't so easy and simple. You would have to convince every known criminal to not repeat their crimes, tell teenagers to not make any trouble, and persuade adults to not commit crimes because they aren't worth it. This would not likely work at all, but if I had the opportunity to stop all crimes in the United States of America, I could save a ton of people easily. The unemployment rate would go up because police officers would be fired. But I think they could easily find other jobs based on their careers like being a bodyguard or security guard.
Comments
Post a Comment