Wouldn't it be amazing if you could know everything? Or what if you are good at everything you try? Well, if you could choose, would you rather be a genius and know everything or be amazing at anything you tried?
I would rather be outstanding at any activity you tried. For example, if I were to take a test, it would be useful to know everything about the test everything you are taking. But if I was also amazing at every activity I try, I would be good at taking tests. But on the other hand, it's the same for being a genius, or it seems to be. If I 'knew" how to be good at making movies, that is different from if I "was" actually good at making movies. But if I needed knowledge for answering a question from a friend, I would be good at it, but that doesn't me I would be correct. I will be good at socializing, but not knowing the answer. There are disadvantages and advantages to both sides, but knowing and doing is the same as saying about doing something and actually doing it. So being good at any activity is better because it actually helps you "do" things. I also can not think of many situations where knowledge will be helpful, maybe being a walking encyclopedia. But activities like getting a job, cooking, earning money, and helping out a friend can help my life and my career. There is also a loophole, if I were good at anything I tried, I would be also good at knowing everything. If I tried to know everything, I would be amazing at it, therefore killing two birds with one stone, is a win-win.
Knowing anything could be cool and helpful, but knowing how to do everything will help me with my life, relationships, and career. Even by finding loopholes, I can try to know everything, but I am amazing at everything I try. Therefore, I will get two abilities at once. This is helpful and useful for everything, I can do anything I want, even pursuing or making something. I could have a wonderful job of a seller or producer of music or movies. So, yes, I'd rather be amazing at anything I tried.
Comments
Post a Comment